Vibrant marriage and the future
When you read this, keep in mind that most of the Muslims in the UK are of Pakistani origin:
Rachna Kumari, 16, was shopping for dresses in this city's dust-choked bazaar when it happened. The man who her family says abducted her was not a street thug. He was a police officer. Nor was he a stranger. Rachna's family knew and trusted him. He guarded the Hindu temple run by her father, an important duty in a society where Hindus are often terrorized by Muslim extremists, and he had helped Rachna cram for her ninth-grade final exams. After she disappeared from the market, he did not demand a ransom. According to her family, he had an entirely different purpose: to force her to convert to Islam and marry him.Of course, the left-wing champions of barbarian immigration aren't likely to be concerned about the risk of adding these vibrant cultural traditions to their societies, since they are statistically less inclined to have children in the first place. This inspires an idea. Perhaps it's best to forget women's suffrage, as it's arguably even more important to not permit those who have no stake in the future any voice in shaping it. Why should the childless be permitted to sentence future generations to whom they have no connection to massive quantities of debt? This also has the added bonus of disproportionately removing the most ideologically problematic women from the electorate as well as many of the most left-leaning men.
In a country where Hindu-dominated India is widely reviled as Enemy No. 1, Pakistan's Hindu community endures extortion, disenfranchisement and other forms of discrimination. These days, however, Hindus are fixated on a surge of kidnappings of teenage girls by young Muslim men who force them to convert and wed. Pakistani human rights activists report as many as 25 cases a month.
Labels: society, Vibrancy is our strength
60 Comments:
Well, I guess if you're trying to speed up the demise of Western Civilization, that's a good tactic. I'm not really sure its demise needs speeding up, though. It's doing pretty well in that area on its own.
Tom Woods has a new learn hisrory site - from a libertatian perspective. Apparently wife stealing is part of Celtic culture whch was part of the
south (citing Andrew Jackson).
http://www.libertyclassroom.com/
I suppose this is an earlier version of game.
In related news, there was once a white American named Ted Bundy who murdered 30 young women.
The interesting thing about women voters is that they often do not make up their mind whom to vote for until the day of the election.
This, according to what they say when polled.
Many of the male Gen X'ers and Millennials have spent most of their formative years being "taught" by women teachers, who don't know what they are going to say until they hear themselves saying it.
I love my wife and I love women.
But...
1) they should not be in charge of teaching boys to be men,
2) they should not be allowed to vote.
Our own women are destroying our society. It's as simple as that.
I wouldn't put the blame just on a certain section of society. We are facing a total onslaught. Special interest groups are just cogs in a much more sinister machine.
How is that related?
"I wouldn't put the blame just on a certain section of society."
Maybe you wouldn't, but I just did.
The trouble with the no kids no vote plan... is that we have well-fare roles stuffed to the gills with baby-momma's who will in face still be "voting".
"Our own women are destroying our society. It's as simple as that."
The power women have accumulated is not new power. Its power they took from the vacuum created by the abdication of male responsibility.
I admire the policeman's restraint. It must have been hard, waiting all that time until she was 16.
How is that related?
It's not.
Id say one vote per net tax paying married couple with at least one child. Someone on the dole or employed by the public has a conflict of interest and shouldnt vote. Married couples demonstrate a concrete reason to care about the future. Simple.
Nate April 25, 2012 7:33 AM
The trouble with the no kids no vote plan... is that we have well-fare roles stuffed to the gills with baby-momma's who will in face still be "voting".
The problem there is the Welfare State. When property rights are not secure, but a group of other people can vote themselves a share of your stuff, society is headed, sooner or later, for economic collapse.
The people who have no children are much less of a threat than the idiots who breed like rabbits, then demand that everyone else pick up the tab for it.
By the way... anyone heard from Taylor?
This story reminds me of the fact that, ironically, most Paki muslims are descendents of converts from the Brahmin caste in Northern India, as opposed to Sudras and other lower castes.
Oh, boy. Certain muslims think of doing the wierdest shit that I would not be able to even conjure up otherwise without reading about it happening in real life.
So the family knows these kidnappings are happening yet they allow this man close proximity to their daughter including helping her with her studies? And only now they've learned to keep the younger sister protected.
Meanwhile in Kyrgyzstan, bride kidnapping is a welcome tradition for both families in half of their marriages. With the bride knowing it's going to happen and the kidnapper being her boyfriend.
Such exotic and fascinating traditions, these people.
the abe April 25, 2012 8:35 AM
This story reminds me of the fact that, ironically, most Paki muslims are descendents of converts from the Brahmin caste in Northern India, as opposed to Sudras and other lower castes.
Blogger
That is not at all surprising.
Perhaps Islam borrowed that from Judaism:
Deuteronomy 22:
28 “If a man finds a young woman who is a virgin, who is not betrothed, and he seizes her and lies with her, and they are found out, 29 then the man who lay with her shall give to the young woman’s father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife because he has humbled her; he shall not be permitted to divorce her all his days.
"Why should the childless be permitted to sentence future generations to whom they have no connection to massive quantities of debt?"
Alter the rule slightly to require the children to be legitimate and I'm on board.
See, because a white dude did something that's not at all similar (murder is very different from sex slave), but will assuage the white guilt he feels for agreeing with the article.
Why do you guys still believe in voting?
I don't know, having children did little to stop the Boomers from destroying their progeny's futures.
Bride kidnapping within a culture (Celtic, Kyrgyzstan, otherwise..) is an extension of arranged marriages. Not saying it's right (or wrong), just that in a cultured where most people over most of history haven't had a say in who they married In the first place, adding in kidnapping is no more unusual than adding ninjas to a Chuck Norris movie: it's entertaining, and it doesn't actually alter the nature of the thing.
And re LES: the Hebrew word translated "seize" is, if I remember correctly, also used for everything from capturing cities to playing musical instruments. So unless the cop in question was an inept devotee of Roissy, it isn't a parallel to the Hebrew tradition.
Uh, huh....you pick up all sorts of strange habits living European Style.
OT- http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=CZ-4gnNz0vc
awesome video
"Perhaps Islam borrowed that from..."
Where in the passage does it say the woman was unwilling.
Note the term "and they are discovered", meaning caught in the act by an eyewitness. Unlike the Western tradition of putting full weight on the word of the woman if she declares it rape ex-post-facto.
OT
I know NR is out of favour here, but, some help?
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/296659/international-trade-peter-robinson
"Bride kidnapping within a culture (Celtic, Kyrgyzstan, otherwise..) is an extension of arranged marriages. Not saying it's right (or wrong), just that in a cultured where most people over most of history haven't had a say in who they married In the first place, adding in kidnapping is no more unusual than adding ninjas to a Chuck Norris movie: it's entertaining, and it doesn't actually alter the nature of the thing."
It's quite inaccurate to compare an arranged marriage by two sets of loving parents to a kidnapping. I actually happen to know a Western European (Caucasian) couple who were gently prodded into getting together and although at first it seemed odd they're now inseparable. They would not have known each other if it wasn't for their parents. Both members of the couple come from good families, are hard working, intelligent, well educated, reasonably wealthy and religious and love each other. In each case the parent had an insight into the character of their child and was able to find similar people through communal ties. What was a bonus was that they could also gauge the extended family and discover that they're all pretty well adjusted, respectable and successful people. Not every arranged marriage has to be between an innocent virgin and a cruel miser, only performed for familial prestige. To compare that to a forced abduction is extreme. What we're probably doing is looking at the old style arranged marriages through our own modern prejudiced culture which can provide an inaccurate view sometimes.
It's actually quite accurate if you did a little research into the traditions of the Kyrgyzstanian people.
Chav 1: What did you do with your girlfriend last night?
Chav 2: I converted her to Islam.
Chav 1: Oh yeah, boom chicka wow wow
I sense an economic opportunity here...take a group of regular guys, get them into good physical shape, teach them game, and have them carry off, viking style, pre-selected females to be their wife...all for a reasonable fee
Would viking style be assembling the best possible team, then blowing it in the playoffs? Or would it be threatening to move the family to LA unless the taxpayers foot the bill for a new house?
OTOH, quite likely it is many of those those with an antipathy to living in a backward society who choose to emigrate.
@JDC
Nice. You are an ass, sir.
That is confirmed. I am also a Lions fan. I take what I can get.
@ Cheddarman : Thanks for not saying, "....carry off, 'like a Raider'..."
The people who have no children are much less of a threat than the idiots who breed like rabbits, then demand that everyone else pick up the tab for it.
Except you forget the gay mafia and their infiltration of various religious organizations as well as the entertainment industry. Last I checked, they aren't breeders.
Did someone declare today as "Moral Equivalence Day" and I just didn't get the memo?
CLAR:"Id say one vote per net tax paying married couple with at least one child. Someone on the dole or employed by the public has a conflict of interest and shouldnt vote. Married couples demonstrate a concrete reason to care about the future. Simple."
Yeah no. See boomers and the last 100 years of eroding property rights due to public education.
Now, if you actually enforce contracts in marriage/divorce laws, I might buy into it. The notion that I'm only caring about the future if I'm married with a kid in this age of no fault divorce/hypergamy is delusional.
Say one vote per non bastard child? If you pay taxes.
While the atrocities committed by Muslims against Hindus are certainly worthy of attention, they do not invalidate the equally horrific and arguably far more widespread atrocities committed by Hindu India (the state as well as its subjects) against all non-Hindus, whether Christian, Muslim, Sikh or merely low/outcaste.
JDC, Viking style means carrying off the woman of your choice, back to the Viking longboat, so that in the course of time she will bear you many strong sons!
"...Kyrgyzstanian..."
Reminds me of Snatch when they called the one of the hitman an Uzbekistanian.
They prefer the term "Kyrgyz" or "Kirghiz."
Capital: Bishkek; with a traditional yurt on their flag. Kind of weird looking actually.
And usually with the -stans it is "Uzbekistani."
I used to be against the forced marriages, but considering the choices young women make nowadays, how could it POSSIBLY be worse? They think in cooter-vision far worse than any man's penis as a dividing rod.
But remember, Kazakhstan has the number one potassium in the region. All others have inferior potassium.
TWO I's! -ii! You heathen.
One i on the end. Double ii is for things like radius.
For HEATHENS! And non-Russians. They like their double i's, as do their neighbors.
I, I, captain.
TZ- Yall are brainwashed yankees! I've had to deal with your kind all my adult life. yall are so full of SHIT!I think its a kind of self-defence mech. of the mind. If yalls kind was so proper for running this country, why is Detroit and the rest of the N.E. such a SHITHOLE!
But since this is clearly an English forum, we'll stick with uzbekistani, pakistani, and kazakhstani, not uzbekistanii, pakistanii, and kazakhstanii. As I said...originally.
SouthTX said [about who should get the right to cast a vote]:
"Say one vote per non bastard child? If you pay taxes."
And, filing for divorce nullifies your right to vote, as does being homosexual, membership in an enviro/socialist organization, being Muslim, being a lawyer, membership in a union, being a government employee (other than uniformed military) or nonwhite.
Not every arranged marriage has to be between an innocent virgin and a cruel miser, only performed for familial prestige. To compare that to a forced abduction is extreme. What we're probably doing is looking at the old style arranged marriages through our own modern prejudiced culture which can provide an inaccurate view sometimes.
The return of arranged marriage would fulfill the dreams of many gammas/omegas, especially those who by virtue of their family's good socio-economic status alone would probably be able to bag a decent-looking girl without any effort on their part.
"But since this is clearly an English forum,..."
Given some of the commentary, only on certain days.
"As I said...originally."
My passport and dictionary, Herr Kommandant.
kh123 is to be transferred to the Russian front immediately.
VILL YOU NEVER LEARN???
"They prefer the term 'Kyrgyz' or 'Kirghiz.'"
...because they can spell. What a joke. Would you like some tea with those crumpets as you pontificate your belly button? I can almost see the felt elbows on that blazer.
"...because they can spell. What a joke. Would you like some tea with those crumpets as you pontificate your belly button? I can almost see the felt elbows on that blazer."
Or it could be a contraction of |Kyrgyz|istan to |Kyrgyz|. Where Kirghiz is the actual pronunciation in English. Come on now, follow along.
Some of us actually consult books. And if that fails you, you could always try Google and Wikipedia.
We'll start simple. I found a children's book for you: The Sneetches
Now a couple of questions just on the Sneetches short story.
- What was the moral of the story regarding stars on the Sneetches bellies?
- Is it a good thing to discriminate like that on physical appearance?
Take you time. Shhh...ease in to it. Slowly.
//sips tea
I'll bet their traditions don't include being a pedant about blog comments, I don't know, what does your book tell you?
Re the idea to restrict voting in the U.S. to whites...
If there's one thing clear post-WWII about different races/ethnicities/religions/etc., it's that they can't live together longterm if the percentage of the smaller group is above a certain threshold; see Yugoslavia, Lebanon, etc., for examples. There are only two majority-white nations in the Western Hemisphere, while there are about 20 that are majority nonwhite (without even getting into the island nations of Cuba, Haiti, the Dominican Republic, Jamaica, etc.). That't plenty of places for the latter to live; whites need countries in which to work, creat and raise their families, and otherwise peacefully live out their lives not as slaves, dhimmis, or the prey of masses of unproductive, immoral, economically useless in a modern economy nonwhite criminals.
Read http://www.colorofcrime.com/colorofcrime2005.html, http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/924795/posts, and the chapter in Edward Banfield's book The Unheavenly City Revisited on how differing socioeconomic classes view time to get a feel for this, if in doubt.
NEIN!!! ...I mean, NYET!!!
Post a Comment
NO ANONYMOUS COMMENTS. Anonymous comments will be deleted.
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home